This HTML5 document contains 31 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n12https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/
n6http://data.silknow.org/vocabulary/
silkhttp://data.silknow.org/ontology/
ecrmhttp://erlangen-crm.org/current/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13http://data.silknow.org/image/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n3http://data.silknow.org/object/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n2http://data.silknow.org/statement/
n10http://data.silknow.org/activity/
n8http://data.silknow.org/object/11c69790-b39e-364b-a5f7-e96cdd26cffe/dimension/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:8a82fa5b-0825-50b8-8f24-f1294582696b
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdf:predicate
ecrm:P65_shows_visual_item
rdf:object
n6:745
rdf:subject
n3:11c69790-b39e-364b-a5f7-e96cdd26cffe
prov:wasGeneratedBy
n10:8a82fa5b-0825-50b8-8f24-f1294582696b
silk:L18
0.7932
Subject Item
n2:cbac12d6-abae-57a4-9577-7e0f54bfa525
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdf:predicate
ecrm:P65_shows_visual_item
rdf:object
n6:745
rdf:subject
n3:11c69790-b39e-364b-a5f7-e96cdd26cffe
prov:wasGeneratedBy
n10:cbac12d6-abae-57a4-9577-7e0f54bfa525
silk:L18
0.7989
Subject Item
n2:c73982c5-be03-5dcc-acc4-c175986d2395
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdf:predicate
ecrm:P65_shows_visual_item
rdf:object
n6:745
rdf:subject
n3:11c69790-b39e-364b-a5f7-e96cdd26cffe
prov:wasGeneratedBy
n10:c73982c5-be03-5dcc-acc4-c175986d2395
silk:L18
0.8868
Subject Item
n3:11c69790-b39e-364b-a5f7-e96cdd26cffe
rdf:type
ecrm:E22_Man-Made_Object
rdfs:label
1780 / 1820, Russia
rdfs:comment
This object is from the collection of Natalia de Shabelsky (1841-1905), a Russian noblewoman compelled to preserve what she perceived as the vanishing folk art traditions of her native country. Traveling extensively throughout Great Russia, she collected many fine examples of textile art of the wealthy peasant class. From the 1870s until moving to France in 1902, Shabelsky amassed a large collection of intricately embroidered hand-woven household textiles and opulent festival garments with rich decoration and elaborate motifs. The Brooklyn Museum holdings include many fine examples including the majority of the garments. Portions of Shabelsky's collection are also housed at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, the Cleveland Art Museum, and the Russian Museum of Ethnography in St. Petersburg.The composition of the upper band suggests that the central form is a stylized representation of the goddess flanked by two minor goddesses on horseback. The goddess as tree of life symbol is often expressive of agricultural fertility. As Russia moved from hunting to an agrarian society, the horse became glorified through connection with the goddess. Though the design lacks other signifiers such as the presence of birds, it was likely an individual interpretation of the motif.
owl:sameAs
n12:158380
dc:identifier
2009.300.3442
ecrm:P3_has_note
This object is from the collection of Natalia de Shabelsky (1841-1905), a Russian noblewoman compelled to preserve what she perceived as the vanishing folk art traditions of her native country. Traveling extensively throughout Great Russia, she collected many fine examples of textile art of the wealthy peasant class. From the 1870s until moving to France in 1902, Shabelsky amassed a large collection of intricately embroidered hand-woven household textiles and opulent festival garments with rich decoration and elaborate motifs. The Brooklyn Museum holdings include many fine examples including the majority of the garments. Portions of Shabelsky's collection are also housed at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, the Cleveland Art Museum, and the Russian Museum of Ethnography in St. Petersburg.The composition of the upper band suggests that the central form is a stylized representation of the goddess flanked by two minor goddesses on horseback. The goddess as tree of life symbol is often expressive of agricultural fertility. As Russia moved from hunting to an agrarian society, the horse became glorified through connection with the goddess. Though the design lacks other signifiers such as the presence of birds, it was likely an individual interpretation of the motif.
ecrm:P43_has_dimension
n8:2 n8:1
ecrm:P65_shows_visual_item
n6:745
ecrm:P138i_has_representation
n13:80e0ef5c-9e05-3f88-a7c2-710467257446 n13:b1fd9243-39f6-3a19-af4f-db5e669d73b1 n13:d99e4b1f-d144-328e-afa1-c908bb12db26
ecrm:P102_has_title
1780 / 1820, Russia