<http://data.silknow.org/activity/97819b55-4d80-51bc-a10d-52cc2e073f04>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Activity> .
<http://data.silknow.org/activity/97819b55-4d80-51bc-a10d-52cc2e073f04>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#atTime>	"2021-02-10T00:00:00"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime> .
<http://data.silknow.org/activity/97819b55-4d80-51bc-a10d-52cc2e073f04>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAssociatedWith>	<http://data.silknow.org/actor/jsi-text-analysis/> .
<http://data.silknow.org/activity/97819b55-4d80-51bc-a10d-52cc2e073f04>	<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#used>	"Probably intended for use as a window shade, this furnishing fabric presents a Gothic Revival motif of stained-glass windows replete with tracery, Tudor rose, and Campbell coat-of-arms.  Although extremely popular, such repeating architectural patterns were condemned by Augustus Welby Pugin, who noted that \"a moment's reflection must show the extreme absurdity of repeating a perspective over a large surface with some hundred different points of sight: a panel or wall may be enriched and decorated at pleasure, but it should always be treated in a consistent manner.\""@en .