This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
n2	http://data.silknow.org/production/
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n5	http://data.silknow.org/vocabulary/
ecrm	http://erlangen-crm.org/current/
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8	https://sws.geonames.org/6269131/
n6	http://data.silknow.org/timespan/
n7	http://data.silknow.org/object/
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

Statements

Subject Item

n2:b6c2a39b-6df2-31d4-821a-e09fac60c1b9

rdf:type

ecrm:E12_Production

rdfs:comment

Closely based on a design by Thomas Chippendale (plate XII, right, in the 1st and 2nd editions of the "Director", 1754 & 1755, and plate XIII, right, repeated in plate XIV, right, in the 3rd edition of the "Director" (1762); the original plate is dated 1753). But the carving is rather flat and lifeless, suggesting that the chair is probably provincial. It differs from the design in certain respects: the C-scrolls at the top of the splat disappear into the top rail rather than ending in a round scroll; and instead the top rail is peaked above the points where the C-scrolls join it. And the forked section of the splat is solid, not pierced, below the scrolling foliage (about a third of the way down). Nevertheless, the faithfulness of the copy is another indication that the chair is likely to be provincial; generally, London makers would not have been so reliant on printed designs.

ecrm:P3_has_note

Closely based on a design by Thomas Chippendale (plate XII, right, in the 1st and 2nd editions of the "Director", 1754 & 1755, and plate XIII, right, repeated in plate XIV, right, in the 3rd edition of the "Director" (1762); the original plate is dated 1753). But the carving is rather flat and lifeless, suggesting that the chair is probably provincial. It differs from the design in certain respects: the C-scrolls at the top of the splat disappear into the top rail rather than ending in a round scroll; and instead the top rail is peaked above the points where the C-scrolls join it. And the forked section of the splat is solid, not pierced, below the scrolling foliage (about a third of the way down). Nevertheless, the faithfulness of the copy is another indication that the chair is likely to be provincial; generally, London makers would not have been so reliant on printed designs.

ecrm:P108_has_produced

n7:37c99ede-54e4-3e6f-9ea2-32ad60ed7a79

ecrm:P32_used_general_technique

n5:168

ecrm:P126_employed

birch(?). Back seat rail reinforced with extra piece of wood. There are four new corner braces which are screwed in. Front and back legs joined by stretchers and cross stretcher. Replacement green coloured silk damask top cover and trimmed with braid. Carved mahogany

ecrm:P4_has_time-span

n6:1755_1770

ecrm:P8_took_place_on_or_within

n8: