This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
n2	http://data.silknow.org/production/
n7	http://data.silknow.org/production/2a8f05e8-fbd8-30a3-abf0-f674b48d93dc/activity/
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n6	https://sws.geonames.org/2635167/
ecrm	http://erlangen-crm.org/current/
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5	http://data.silknow.org/timespan/
n8	http://data.silknow.org/object/
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

Statements

Subject Item

n2:2a8f05e8-fbd8-30a3-abf0-f674b48d93dc

rdf:type

ecrm:E12_Production

rdfs:comment

Though very different in style from the burr-walnut and gilt chairs at Houghton, the use of the same ticking base cloth (collated between W.2-2002 and W.27-2002) suggests that they were made -- or at least upholstered -- in the same workshop, and quite close to each other in date. The burr-walnut and gilt suite has been attributed to Thomas Roberts junior, on the strength of his single surviving bill to Robert Walpole of c. 1729, which mainly relates to furniture supplied for Walpole's London houses (but which includes the supply of caffoy for the Saloon at Houghton). The difference in style is probably explicable in terms of the burr-walnut and gilt suite being made to suit the pre-existing embroidered bed; and in the present state of knowledge it seems reasonable to suppose that both suites were manufactured and upholstered entirely in one workshop, most likely that of Thomas Roberts junior.

ecrm:P3_has_note

Though very different in style from the burr-walnut and gilt chairs at Houghton, the use of the same ticking base cloth (collated between W.2-2002 and W.27-2002) suggests that they were made -- or at least upholstered -- in the same workshop, and quite close to each other in date. The burr-walnut and gilt suite has been attributed to Thomas Roberts junior, on the strength of his single surviving bill to Robert Walpole of c. 1729, which mainly relates to furniture supplied for Walpole's London houses (but which includes the supply of caffoy for the Saloon at Houghton). The difference in style is probably explicable in terms of the burr-walnut and gilt suite being made to suit the pre-existing embroidered bed; and in the present state of knowledge it seems reasonable to suppose that both suites were manufactured and upholstered entirely in one workshop, most likely that of Thomas Roberts junior.

ecrm:P108_has_produced

n8:d3163e13-ae09-3839-addf-27a0faeb57e1

ecrm:P32_used_general_technique

carving

ecrm:P126_employed

Carved and gilded walnut, with green velvet cover trimmed with silk braid

ecrm:P4_has_time-span

n5:c5d98d85-9239-38e0-a4d8-2463be976245

ecrm:P8_took_place_on_or_within

n6:

ecrm:P9_consists_of

n7:1