This HTML5 document contains 8 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
dc	http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8	https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/
ecrm	http://erlangen-crm.org/current/
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n6	http://data.silknow.org/image/
owl	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n2	http://data.silknow.org/object/
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

Statements

Subject Item

n2:36f86b73-be0e-3a06-bcf6-0d6f428cc480

rdf:type

ecrm:E22_Man-Made_Object

rdfs:label

rdfs:comment

This textile may be compared with another textile in the Museum’s collection (17.22.2a–d) with a very similar pattern, but incorporating metal-wrapped threads. The all-silk version would have been less expensive to manufacture, and could possibly have been a provincial imitation of textiles produced in Constantinople and Bursa. Note that the Greek letters of the inscriptions have been reversed. The size and shape of the piece suggest that it formed part of a phelonion, or chasuble.

owl:sameAs

n8:214318

dc:identifier

08.109.16

ecrm:P3_has_note

This textile may be compared with another textile in the Museum’s collection (17.22.2a–d) with a very similar pattern, but incorporating metal-wrapped threads. The all-silk version would have been less expensive to manufacture, and could possibly have been a provincial imitation of textiles produced in Constantinople and Bursa. Note that the Greek letters of the inscriptions have been reversed. The size and shape of the piece suggest that it formed part of a phelonion, or chasuble.

ecrm:P138i_has_representation

n6:798ea21b-8740-3a96-9d9b-1db66780af5d

ecrm:P102_has_title